Follow the #MotorcadeForTrade RV whistle stop tour from April 12th–26th! Learn more

News Archive

Month: September 2017

Farmers for Free Trade Co-Chairs Baucus, Lugar Pen Op-Ed: “Four Ways to Rebuild Consensus on Agricultural Trade”

In Bloomberg op-ed, Senators Max Baucus (D-MT) and Richard Lugar (R-IN) argue that supporting American farmers and ranchers will require negotiating trade agreements that access new markets, avoiding retaliation, modernizing NAFTA without threatening gains, and organizing at the grassroots level 

Bozeman, MT/Washington, D.C. – Recent U.S. Ambassador to China, Max Baucus (D-MT), and former Chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, Richard Lugar (R-IN), have written an op-ed in Bloomberg View that lays out specific steps for rebuilding consensus on agricultural trade. Senators Baucus and Lugar are the Co-chairs of Farmers for Free Trade, a bipartisan non-profit focused on driving global competitiveness for the U.S. agriculture industry and supporting jobs that depend on agricultural trade.

The full text of the Bloomberg View op-ed (click here for an online version):

The financial health of American farmers depends on trade. In what remains the “breadbasket of the world,” U.S. farmers export half of all major commodities they grow, contributing to a projected trade surplus of $20 billion this year alone and supporting millions of direct and indirect jobs. At a time when American farm incomes have been rapidly declining, trade is what’s helping to keep farmers, ranchers and many rural communities afloat.

Not so long ago, we served in Washington D.C. when these realities were well understood. It was a time when bipartisan support for opening new markets to our farmers was assumed and expected. As globalization took hold, we understood that trade agreements were our only tool to ensure that American wheat, soy or beef could out-compete other countries’ products vying for the same markets. It was a consensus that delivered for millions of American farmers. Today, that consensus has faded.

American agricultural trade is facing risks not seen in a generation. Public attitudes toward trade agreements have shifted as protectionist sentiment has grown. Threats of tariffs on U.S. trading partners invite the specter of retaliation. Meanwhile, our competitors plot to assume the mantle of global supplier the U.S. has long occupied.

We need to rebuild consensus on agriculture trade. It must be one that incorporates the position of American farmers; that reflects the needs of rural communities; that is echoed by state and local leaders, and that seeks to heal the deep fissures on trade in Washington D.C.

We believe that consensus can be built around four important steps.

First, we need to get off the sidelines and get back in the business of negotiating trade agreements. The U.S. currently does not have a single ongoing trade negotiation that gives our farmers access to the rapidly growing Asian market. Our absence in Asia means that China is quickly moving into the void with its own trade deals that outflank U.S. agricultural producers. One of those China-led deals, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, involves 15 other Asia-Pacific countries with growing middle classes, many of whom are clamoring for the agricultural bounty the U.S. once supplied.

Meanwhile, agriculture powerhouses like Canada, New Zealand and Australia are cutting bilateral deals that provide preferential treatment for their commodities.

Take the example of beef. According to the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, as of this week, the U.S. has now lost out to Australia on more than $165 million in beef sales to Japan. That happened because Australia cut a trade deal with Japan in 2015, and we recently walked away from one.

These sharp competitive disadvantages are becoming the norm, and while it’s difficult to calculate all the untapped gains the U.S. has lost, the numbers are clear on how we reverse the trend. Since 2003, U.S. agricultural exports to countries we do have trade agreements with increased more than 136 percent.

Second, we need to remove the threat of retaliation against U.S. agriculture. Our trading partners are not novices when it comes to whom and what they retaliate against when the U.S. runs afoul of our international commitments. U.S. farmers are always target number one.

That is because our trading partners know it is the economic engine for so many states, and because the pain inflicted is immediate and acute.

For example, the last time Mexico retaliated against the U.S., their targets included everything from corn, to apples, to almonds and grapes. The Department of Agriculture estimated that those measures cost U.S. growers close to $1 billion in lost sales.

We know there are onerous trade practices that must be addressed through diplomacy and other mechanisms for setting disputes. But threatening our closest trading partners with blanket tariffs, border taxes or aggressive enforcement actions risks a trade war that would have no winners.

Third, we need to modernize NAFTA in a way doesn’t erode the enormous gains it has delivered for American farmers and ranchers. That means working to eliminate any remaining tariff and non-tariff barriers, simplifying packaging and labeling requirements, and improving agriculture opportunities through e-commerce platforms.

But it also means doing no harm to a pact that — according to the Farm Bureau — has resulted in an annual jump of agriculture exports from $8.9 billion in 1993 to $38 billion last year.

The Trump administration has a real opportunity to expand on those gains. They should do it quickly and thoughtfully so we can turn to the task of keeping pace with our competitors.

Finally, to rebuild consensus on trade, we need to organize and educate. We know there are officials in the administration and in Congress who understand the value of agricultural trade. Yet, recent trade debates have too often become a microcosm of our broader partisan politics.

To support this effort, we’re launching a bipartisan, not-for-profit organization called Farmers for Free Trade, to build a coalition of farmers, mayors and community leaders in congressional districts across the country. This isn’t only about the over 1 million U.S. jobs supported by agriculture trade, but also the secondary and tertiary jobs it creates in rural communities: from growers, harvesters, processors, and packagers to grain elevator operators, railroad workers, truck drivers and port operators.

Rebuilding consensus on trade begins in the heartland and capitalizes on the great strength of American farmers and ranchers. If we can do that, America wins.


Max Baucus, is a Democrat from Montana who served in the U.S. Senate for 6 terms before being tapped by President Obama to represent the U.S. as our ambassador to China, a post he held from 2014 to 2017. As ambassador, and prior to that as chair of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, Baucus was a staunch advocate for American agriculture in all trade negotiations. Baucus now lives in Bozeman, Mont.

Richard Lugar is a Republican who represented Indiana in the U.S. Senate from 1977 to 2013. During his distinguished career, he served as chairman of both the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry.  He is President and Chairman of the Board of the Lugar Center, which seeks to improve global food security, bipartisan governance, and nuclear security.  He also manages his family’s 604-acre corn, soybean, and tree farm in Indiana.


Farmers for Free Trade is a 501(c)(4) non-profit dedicated to supporting and expanding the economic benefits of free trade for American farmers and ranchers.  Its mission is to keep, enhance and advance trade agreements by lending a pragmatic voice to negotiations impacting the industry.  For more information, please contact [email protected], follow us @FarmersForTrade or visit

Copyright © 2019 Farmers for Free Trade. All rights reserved.

Your information will not be shared in any way with other organizations or businesses. Farmers for Free Trade is a 501(c)(4) not-for-profit organization. Contributions to Farmers for Free Trade are not tax deductible.

Connect with us