Follow the #MotorcadeForTrade RV whistle stop tour from April 12th–26th! Learn more

News Archive

Month: May 2018

Farmers for Free Trade Statement on Imposition of Steel and Aluminum Tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and the E.U.

​FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                         CONTACT: [email protected]

“These tariffs will harm U.S. farmers and take many American farm operations to the breaking point.”

“American farmers overwhelmingly supported President Trump in 2016 but will not be silent in the face of trade wars that harm U.S. agriculture.”

(Washington, D.C.) – Today, Brian Kuehl, Executive Director of Farmers for Free Trade made the following statement after Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross announced that the U.S. will place steel and aluminum tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and the E.U. All of the targeted countries are expected to place retaliatory tariffs on American ag products.

“This announcement opens the floodgates to billions in new tariffs on American agriculture. The list of countries targeting or planning to target American ag exports now includes 28 E.U. members, our closest trading partners in Canada and Mexico, and the world’s largest export markets in China and India. These are markets that the American heartland depends on for economic survival. 

“These tariffs will harm U.S. farmers and take many American farm operations to the breaking point. Already, farmers are grappling with the impact of previous tariffs which have caused falling commodity futures, higher equipment prices, and the markets they’ve fought to get into for decades to vanish overnight. The addition of new retaliatory tariffs on everything from bourbon, to rice, to orange juice and cranberries will only widen the pain to additional farmers across the country.

“American farmers overwhelmingly supported President Trump in 2016 but will not be silent in the face of trade wars that harm U.S. agriculture. This summer, as lawmakers return home, the voices of farmers who are bearing the brunt of trade chaos and uncertainty will be heard.  For many farmers, this is a matter of economic survival.  We will continue to fight to ensure the Administration is listening to America’s rural communities in the weeks and months ahead.”

###

 

Four Steps to Turn U.S.-China Framework into Actual Certainty and Stability for American Farmers

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 5/21/18               CONTACT: [email protected]

 Farmers for Free Trade applauds progress but cautions that much work remains

(Washington D.C.) – Today, Brian Kuehl, Executive Director of Farmers for Free Trade, released the following statement on the framework the U.S. and China announced over the weekend as part of negotiations on avoiding additional tariffs. Farmers for Free Trade, is a bipartisan coalition that has been organizing farmers nationally in support of free trade and that has spearheaded advocacy efforts to protect ag trade and open new markets.

“The framework that the U.S. and China agreed to is an important first step in de-escalating trade tensions that have hurt the American heartland. We applaud the Administration’s focus on supporting U.S. ag exports in this framework, but note that there is still an enormous amount of work that must be done to take this agreement from concept to reality and to deliver certainty and stability to farmers and ranchers. Specifically, as the U.S. prepares to send Cabinet officials to China to iron out details of this agreement and as NAFTA negotiations continue, Farmers for Free Trade believes that Administration officials should focus on four outcomes that will help deliver for American agriculture.

“First, U.S. officials need to address the non-tariff barriers that have always been a primary mechanism China uses to keep American agriculture exports lower than they should be. USTR’s own analysis has shown that China has long erected barriers to pork, poultry, beef and other commodities long after importation has been declared safe under international guidelines. We can’t meaningfully increase ag exports to China without addressing these barriers on which the Chinese have routinely refused to make meaningful progress.

“Second, the U.S. needs to provide farmers with a clear strategy for also defusing tensions around steel and aluminum tariffs and NAFTA. That means answering the question of whether China will also drop the retaliatory tariffs impacting farmers right now on nuts, fruit, wine, pork and other ag exports that stem from steel and aluminum tariffs. It also means providing certainty on NAFTA by ending demands for the agreement to end every five years and for completely ending the threat of unilateral withdrawal from the agreement. Until there is certainty on these fronts, a deal on 301 tariffs alone will do little to ease the anxieties of farmers who make investments years in advance and whose biggest threat is unpredictability.

“Third, we need the U.S. Department of Agriculture at the negotiating table. The professionals at USDA are not only the chief advocates for American ag exports, they’re also the experts. We hope that when the delegation of U.S. officials travels to China, Secretary Perdue and his team will help lead talks with China on how they will not only increase exports but finally tear down the non-tariff barriers that have been a major impediment to getting our products into their market. Together with ag champions like USTR’s Gregg Doud, USDA can help deliver for American farmers.

“Finally, we need to get back in the business of opening new markets for American ag exports. A major component of giving farmers confidence and predictability needs to be a focus on growing, not contracting, market access across the globe. In order to do that we need to pivot away from a focus on revisiting old agreements to opening new ones. Our competitors have spent the last half-decade negotiating access that has given their ag exports a competitive advantage while we’ve been hamstrung both by policy and politics. It’s time to end the brinksmanship and launch proactive, constructive relationships with countries that are hungry for the world’s best ag products.”

###

Fourth Generation Montana Farmer Michelle Erickson-Jones to Testify for Farmers for Free Trade at USTR 301 Hearing

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 5/14/18                                                CONTACT: [email protected]

Erickson-Jones in testimony to USTR: “The U.S. farm community is already feeling the effects of threatened tariff action including depressed commodity prices, shipments held up at port, increased inspections and cancelled orders. Make no mistake about it, these market interruptions can devastate ag prices and drive U.S. farmers out of business.”

(Washington D.C.) – Tomorrow, Michelle Erickson-Jones, a member of Farmers for Free Trade, will testify at the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) hearing on potential tariffs related to Section 301 trade actions against China. In her testimony, Erickson-Jones who raises grains, oilseeds, alfalfa, and cow-calves in Broadview, Montana, will point out that the threatened 301 tariffs are already American hurting farmers and ranchers through decreased prices and new non-tariff barriers.

Key excerpts from Erickson-Jones’s testimony:

“While the Section 301 tariffs are not yet in effect, the U.S. farm community is already feeling the effects of threatened tariff action including depressed commodity prices, shipments held up at port, increased inspections and cancelled orders.  This comes at a time when the industry that is already rife with uncertainty around re-negotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”).  Make no mistake about it, these market interruptions can devastate ag prices and drive U.S. farmers out of business.”

“Further complicating matters, China appears to also be increasing non-tariff barriers, like stepped-up inspections, creating costly and damaging delays for perishable commodities.  California winery LangeTwins has experienced this.  It previously sold grapes in bulk but has vertically integrated its operation to bring more value back to the farm gate.  In recent weeks, this family-owned business has had several wine shipments to China delayed at port or cancelled.  Years of effort, negotiation, trust-building, investment and profit lost in an instant. Meanwhile other industries such as beef and rice that have been working hard to gain market access to China now see their efforts set back while competitors from other countries take advantage of the uncertainty.”

“Currently farmers across America are in the field wondering whether the seeds they are planting will produce a profitable crop at harvest time in the fall.  On their behalf, Farmers for Free Trade urges the Administration to take a thoughtful and long-term approach to resolving the Section 301 trade dispute with China.  We further ask that the U.S. focus its attention on opening this important market to more high quality, safe and affordable food exported from America.”

Michelle Erickson-Jones appeared in a TV campaign launched by Farmers for Free Trade earlier this year warning about the unintended consequences of tariffs and trade uncertainty. For more on that ad visit HERE.

Michelle Erickson-Jones’s full testimony is below:

Good afternoon. My name is Michelle Erickson-Jones and I am a fourth-generation farmer from Montana.  I am President of the Montana Grain Growers Association, serve on the Board of Directors of the National Association of Wheat Growers and am a member of Farmers for Free Trade.  It is my honor to testify today on the impacts of Section 301 proposed tariffs on U.S. farmers, agribusiness and the entire rural economy.

Farmers for Free Trade is a bipartisan, non-profit organization that represents American farmers, ranchers and agricultural businesses.  Our members recognize that their livelihood is supported by and benefits from, the highly-integrated, cross-border supply chains that make up the agriculture and food processing industries serving customers around the globe.

American agriculture is a tremendous global marketing success story. We export 50 percent of our major commodity crops such as corn, wheat and soybeans, 70 percent of fruit nuts, and more than 25 percent of our pork.  Exports account for 20 percent of all U.S. farm revenue and rely on strong commercial relationships in key markets including Canada, Mexico, Japan, the European Union and, or course, China – the second largest market for U.S. agriculture, accounting for nearly $19 billion in exports in 2017.  U.S. agriculture exports also support over 1,000,000 American jobs.  As such, trade is critically important to the U.S. economy and our rural communities.

As I have noted publicly in recent months, “while many rural American families are optimistic about economic growth under the current Administration, there is mounting concern among farmers about trade policies that would reduce access to the export markets they depend on.”

Farmers for Free Trade respects the Administration’s efforts to address China’s unfair trade practices; however, we are very concerned about the unintended consequences if the tariffs are placed on Chinese imports under the Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act.  Of particular concern is the likely damage to a vital market that I, and other farmers, depend on.

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has asked whether maintaining or imposing additional duties on a particular product would cause disproportionate economic harm to U.S. interests.  With respect to farmers and ranchers, the answer is clear – it will – and we are already seeing the effects.  This comes at a time when American farmers are currently bearing the brunt of the U.S.-China trade dispute related to the Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum. The retaliation for these tariffs is imposing a staggering burden on key U.S. farm sectors including grapes, wine, almonds, walnuts, pistachios, pork, and oranges.

Let me offer a personal example about how the Section 232 tariffs are raising the cost of capital investments for farmers such as myself. Earlier this year we priced a new 25,000-bushel grain bin to increase grain storage capacity on our farm. The price was 12 percent higher than an identical bin we had built in 2017. As we weighed our options, the initial bid on bin #2 expired, so we sought a second bid.  This bid was 8 percent higher than the initial one just a few weeks prior – a 20 percent increase in the cost of a steel product in just one year.

The bin company attributed the increase to a significant increase in their cost of steel.  It seems their domestically sourced steel suppliers had increased their prices to match the price of imported steel.  As a result of this dramatic cost increase and volatility in the market, we abandoned our grain storage expansion project. The implications of that decision not only harmed my operation, it also hurt my community: a small local construction company lost a project, a U.S. grain bin company missed a sale, and a domestic steel company had one less shipment to send out of their factory.

Now let me provide some real-world examples on the impact of Chinese retaliation on U.S. agriculture from the 232.

China is the third-largest export market for fresh cherries from the United States.  In 2017, U.S. exporters shipped $119 million of fresh cherries.  For California, cherry exports doubled over the past five years and the California cherry industry sees China as the export market with the greatest growth potential, far surpassing Canada as the largest export market for cherries produced in the Pacific Northwest.

Cherries now also face a 15% retaliatory tariff. The walnut industry is similarly dependent on exports to foreign markets and is now facing a 15% retaliatory tariff from China.  Any additional tariffs – and China’s likely retaliation – will further exacerbate supply chain uncertainty at a time when farmers’ livelihoods are dependent on their ability to export their crops and products to China.

It is important to note that while the Section 301 tariffs are not yet in effect, the U.S. farm community is already feeling the effects of threatened tariff action including depressed commodity prices, shipments held up at port, increased inspections and cancelled orders.  This comes at a time when the industry that is already rife with uncertainty around re-negotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”).  Make no mistake about it, these market interruptions can devastate ag prices and drive U.S. farmers out of business.

Brent Bible, a Farmers for Free Trade member who operates a 5,000 acre corn and soybean farm in Lafayette, Indiana, states that “for those farmers that are operating on thin lines of profit and credit and are already financial unstable, [any further trade disruption] easily has the ability to be the straw that breaks the camel’s back.”

The soy industry is close to that breaking point as sales of soybeans to China have fallen from about 255,000 metric tons in the first week of April, when the trade dispute began, to just 7,900 in the last week of April. Cancellations have also jumped, to more than 140,000 metric tons in the week ending April 26; in the same week last year, there were no canceled sales at all.

Further complicating matters, China appears to also be increasing non-tariff barriers, like stepped-up inspections, creating costly and damaging delays for perishable commodities. California winery LangeTwins has experienced this.  It previously sold grapes in bulk but has vertically integrated its operation to bring more value back to the farm gate.  In recent weeks, this family-owned business has had several wine shipments to China delayed at port or cancelled.  Years of effort, negotiation, trust-building, investment and profit lost in an instant.

Meanwhile other industries such as beef and rice that have been working hard to gain market access to China now see their efforts set back while competitors from other countries take advantage of the uncertainty.

We also know from previous trade disputes that the impacts will be felt from farm to fork including secondary industries such as seed manufacturers, agricultural equipment dealers and credit lenders.  This would be devastating to America’s rural communities where these industries serve as the chief economic driver.

Currently farmers across America are in the field wondering whether the seeds they are planting will produce a profitable crop at harvest time in the fall.  On their behalf, Farmers for Free Trade urges the Administration to take a thoughtful and long-term approach to resolving the Section 301 trade dispute with China.  We further ask that the U.S. focus its attention on opening this important market to more high quality, safe and affordable food exported from America.

Thank you for your consideration of our comments.

###

Fourth Generation Montana Farmer Michelle Erickson-Jones to Testify for Farmers for Free Trade at USTR 301 Hearing

Erickson-Jones in testimony to USTR: “The U.S. farm community is already feeling the effects of threatened tariff action including depressed commodity prices, shipments held up at port, increased inspections and cancelled orders.”

(Washington D.C.) – Tomorrow, Michelle Erickson-Jones, a member of Farmers for Free Trade, will testify at the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) hearing on potential tariffs related to Section 301 trade actions against China. In her testimony, Erickson-Jones who raises grains, oilseeds, alfalfa, and cow-calves in Broadview, Montana, will point out that the threatened 301 tariffs are already American hurting farmers and ranchers through decreased prices and new non-tariff barriers.

Michelle Erickson-Jones appeared in a TV campaign launched by Farmers for Free Trade earlier this year warning about the unintended consequences of tariffs and trade uncertainty. For more on that ad visit HERE.

Michelle Erickson-Jones’s full testimony is below:

MICHELLE ERICKSON-JONES TESTIMONY

ON BEHALF OF

FARMERS FOR FREE TRADE

 

Docket Number:  USTR-2018-005

MULTI-INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF ACTINO PURSUANT TO SECTION 301:  CHINA’S ACTS, POLICIES, AND PRACTICES RELATED TO TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND INNOVATION

May 15, 2018

Good afternoon. My name is Michelle Erickson-Jones and I am a fourth-generation farmer from Montana.  I am President of the Montana Grain Growers Association, serve on the Board of Directors of the National Association of Wheat Growers and am a member of Farmers for Free Trade.  It is my honor to testify today on the impacts of Section 301 proposed tariffs on U.S. farmers, agribusiness and the entire rural economy.

Farmers for Free Trade is a bipartisan, non-profit organization that represents American farmers, ranchers and agricultural businesses.  Our members recognize that their livelihood is supported by and benefits from, the highly-integrated, cross-border supply chains that make up the agriculture and food processing industries serving customers around the globe.

 

American agriculture is a tremendous global marketing success story. We export 50 percent of our major commodity crops such as corn, wheat and soybeans, 70 percent of fruit nuts, and more than 25 percent of our pork.  Exports account for 20 percent of all U.S. farm revenue and rely on strong commercial relationships in key markets including Canada, Mexico, Japan, the European Union and, or course, China – the second largest market for U.S. agriculture, accounting for nearly $19 billion in exports in 2017.  U.S. agriculture exports also support over 1,000,000 American jobs.  As such, trade is critically important to the U.S. economy and our rural communities.

 

As I have noted publicly in recent months, “while many rural American families are optimistic about economic growth under the current Administration, there is mounting concern among farmers about trade policies that would reduce access to the export markets they depend on.”

 

Farmers for Free Trade respects the Administration’s efforts to address China’s unfair trade practices; however, we are very concerned about the unintended consequences if the tariffs are placed on Chinese imports under the Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act.  Of particular concern is the likely damage to a vital market that I, and other farmers, depend on.

 

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has asked whether maintaining or imposing additional duties on a particular product would cause disproportionate economic harm to U.S. interests.  With respect to farmers and ranchers, the answer is clear – it will – and we are already seeing the effects.  This comes at a time when American farmers are currently bearing the brunt of the U.S.-China trade dispute related to the Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum. The retaliation for these tariffs is imposing a staggering burden on key U.S. farm sectors including grapes, wine, almonds, walnuts, pistachios, pork, and oranges.

 

Let me offer a personal example about how the Section 232 tariffs are raising the cost of capital investments for farmers such as myself. Earlier this year we priced a new 25,000-bushel grain bin to increase grain storage capacity on our farm. The price was 12 percent higher than an identical bin we had built in 2017. As we weighed our options, the initial bid on bin #2 expired, so we sought a second bid.  This bid was 8 percent higher than the initial one just a few weeks prior – a 20 percent increase in the cost of a steel product in just one year.

 

The bin company attributed the increase to a significant increase in their cost of steel.  It seems their domestically sourced steel suppliers had increased their prices to match the price of imported steel.  As a result of this dramatic cost increase and volatility in the market, we abandoned our grain storage expansion project. The implications of that decision not only harmed my operation, it also hurt my community: a small local construction company lost a project, a U.S. grain bin company missed a sale, and a domestic steel company had one less shipment to send out of their factory.

 

Now let me provide some real-world examples on the impact of Chinese retaliation on U.S. agriculture from the 232.

 

China is the third-largest export market for fresh cherries from the United States.  In 2017, U.S. exporters shipped $119 million of fresh cherries.  For California, cherry exports doubled over the past five years and the California cherry industry sees China as the export market with the greatest growth potential, far surpassing Canada as the largest export market for cherries produced in the Pacific Northwest.

 

Cherries now also face a 15% retaliatory tariff. The walnut industry is similarly dependent on exports to foreign markets and is now facing a 15% retaliatory tariff from China.  Any additional tariffs – and China’s likely retaliation – will further exacerbate supply chain uncertainty at a time when farmers’ livelihoods are dependent on their ability to export their crops and products to China.

 

It is important to note that while the Section 301 tariffs are not yet in effect, the U.S. farm community is already feeling the effects of threatened tariff action including depressed commodity prices, shipments held up at port, increased inspections and cancelled orders.  This comes at a time when the industry that is already rife with uncertainty around re-negotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”).  Make no mistake about it, these market interruptions can devastate ag prices and drive U.S. farmers out of business.

Brent Bible, a Farmers for Free Trade member who operates a 5,000 acre corn and soybean farm in Lafayette, Indiana, states that “for those farmers that are operating on thin lines of profit and credit and are already financial unstable, [any further trade disruption] easily has the ability to be the straw that breaks the camel’s back.”

The soy industry is close to that breaking point as sales of soybeans to China have fallen from about 255,000 metric tons in the first week of April, when the trade dispute began, to just 7,900 in the last week of April. Cancellations have also jumped, to more than 140,000 metric tons in the week ending April 26; in the same week last year, there were no canceled sales at all.

Further complicating matters, China appears to also be increasing non-tariff barriers, like stepped-up inspections, creating costly and damaging delays for perishable commodities.  California winery LangeTwins has experienced this.  It previously sold grapes in bulk but has vertically integrated its operation to bring more value back to the farm gate.  In recent weeks, this family-owned business has had several wine shipments to China delayed at port or cancelled.  Years of effort, negotiation, trust-building, investment and profit lost in an instant.

Meanwhile other industries such as beef and rice that have been working hard to gain market access to China now see their efforts set back while competitors from other countries take advantage of the uncertainty.

We also know from previous trade disputes that the impacts will be felt from farm to fork including secondary industries such as seed manufacturers, agricultural equipment dealers and credit lenders.  This would be devastating to America’s rural communities where these industries serve as the chief economic driver.

Currently farmers across America are in the field wondering whether the seeds they are planting will produce a profitable crop at harvest time in the fall.  On their behalf, Farmers for Free Trade urges the Administration to take a thoughtful and long-term approach to resolving the Section 301 trade dispute with China.  We further ask that the U.S. focus its attention on opening this important market to more high quality, safe and affordable food exported from America.

Thank you for your consideration of our comments.

 

###

 

Copyright © 2019 Farmers for Free Trade. All rights reserved.

Your information will not be shared in any way with other organizations or businesses. Farmers for Free Trade is a 501(c)(4) not-for-profit organization. Contributions to Farmers for Free Trade are not tax deductible.

Connect with us